Senator Russ Feingold has a great diary over at dailykos.com, debunking our fearful leader's reasons for why it was necessary to violate FISA and the constitution… If, as our fearful leader says, 1978's FISA was "out-of-date", does it also say that the Constitution is out of date? Really? And if a law is out of date, shouldn't the law be changed, rather than violated?
As Senator Feingold asks, "Why does this President feel we must sacrifice our freedoms to fight terrorism?"
