I sure hope Matt Taibbi is wrong…

Matt Taibbi, who has been one of the best writers out there writing about the crash of our economy and the resulting recession, has a pretty pessimistic post today about the health care reform situation.  And while I hope and pray that he is wrong, I fear that he is right… The monied interests entrenched against any serious reform have basically bought off all of the republicans and enough idiot democrats that I despair for any serious reform.

I wonder when we’ll really figure it out, and see that every other first world country achieves better health results for a fraction of the money we spend, and manage to cover EVERYONE.

The Importance of Education, and of Supporting Education

Matthew Yglesias has a great post at his blog which describes a McKinsey report that analyzes the economic cost of having a poor education system.  From his blog:

…having a high-performing school system is extremely valuable. This is important to keep in mind when talking about spending money on schools or other social services aimed at children and their parents. There’s much more to improving educational outcomes than spending money at random, but insofar as you identify a use for the money that’s genuinely useful it’s worth spending extremely freely.

Among the statistics he sites:

If the United States had in recent years closed the gap between its educational achievement levels and those of better-performing nations such as Finland and Korea, GDP in 2008 could have been $1.3 trillion to $2.3 trillion higher. This represents 9 to 16 percent of GDP. (emphasis his)

Follow the link to see the rest of the stats.  It truly does make it clear how important education is, and further illustrates the sheer lunacy of wannabe Republican presidential candidates like South Carolina governor Mark Sanford, who are actively reject stimulus money from the federal government.  Money that could be spent on… hmm… education.

Thirteen+ months later…

So it’s been a long time… and I need to get back in the swing of blogging. Since I’ve last blogged, I’ve seen (among other things):

  • The birth of my second child
  • a 13-3 record for my Dallas Cowboys, only to get nipped by the juggernaut that was the eventual Super Bowl Champ Giants in the playoffs
  • My Cal Bears being about 90 minutes away from the #1 ranking in the land, only to see that slip away in the final seconds of a loss to Oregon State, followed by one of the all-time implosions (impressive even by Cal standards)
  • Those same bears firing the men’s basketball coach and replacing him with a fantastic coach whose most recent college job was the head coach at Cal’s arch-rival, Stanfurd… and strangely enough, the firing came the day immediately after I sent a long, passionate letter to the athletic director indicating my displeasure with the direction of the basketball team (not that there was any cause-and-effect, but it was still a strange coincidence)
  • My Angels losing twice in the postseason, both times to the Red Sox, and “blessed” with management that doesn’t seem to understand much about how to identify quality offensive players (outside of the trade for Mark Teixeira, who many people think will spurn the Angels for greener pastures)
  • A very intense Democratic primary, with 3 high-quality candidates, in which my first choice dropped out the day after I decided to donate money to him, and then later was found to have been hiding an affair which would have crushed his presidential hopes had he won the nomination (and has effectively scuttled a future in politics for him… John Edwards, I think that you showed an unforgivable level of arrogance in hiding that affair)
  • A mixed-race candidate win the presidential nomination of a major party
  • A supposedly democratic congress caving to a president with record-high levels of unpopularity and granting him powers (and granting telecoms retroactive immunity) that a republican congress was unable to give him
  • The banking deregulation chickens coming home to roost in the recent economic crisis, in which the current administration’s initial response was to give away, with no strings attached, $700 billion of taxpayer money to the very people who created the mess(!)

I’ve left out many things, of course, but those were some of the first things I thought when i thought about what I would have blogged about. My impetus for blogging again today was a quote I saw from David Sedaris in the New Yorker (h/t Balloon Juice):

To put them in perspective, I think of being on an airplane. The flight attendant comes down the aisle with her food cart and, eventually, parks it beside my seat. “Can I interest you in the chicken?” she asks. “Or would you prefer the platter of shit with bits of broken glass in it?”

To be undecided in this election is to pause for a moment and then ask how the chicken is cooked.

I don’t know if anyone could have put it better (although I will admit that after reading the full article, I don’t know if it was intended with the same implications that I read into it)… However, I’ll just leave it at that and let you decide :) .

One final link…. A great post by Ta-Nehisi Coates.

“The One Percent Doctrine”…

is the name of a new book by Ron Suskind (amazon.com link here), which details the administrations actions and policies in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of 9/11. A good insight into the book is given in a review by the Washington Post, which explains in detail what Suskind learned about the man George W. Bush called "one of the top operatives plotting and planning death and destruction on the United States," Abu Zubaydah. However, according to the review,

Abu Zubaydah, his captors discovered, turned out to be mentally ill and nothing like the pivotal figure they supposed him to be. CIA and FBI analysts, poring over a diary he kept for more than a decade, found entries "in the voice of three people: Hani 1, Hani 2, and Hani 3" — a boy, a young man and a middle-aged alter ego. All three recorded in numbing detail "what people ate, or wore, or trifling things they said." Dan Coleman, then the FBI's top al-Qaeda analyst, told a senior bureau official, "This guy is insane, certifiable, split personality."

Hmm… so a man thought to be a major adversary in the War on Terror turns out to be mentally disturbed. Could it get worse? Only if one was to then torture this man and then use information obtained in the torture of an insane man in the run-up to war:

Abu Zubaydah also appeared to know nothing about terrorist operations; rather, he was al-Qaeda's go-to guy for minor logistics — travel for wives and children and the like. That judgment was "echoed at the top of CIA and was, of course, briefed to the President and Vice President," Suskind writes. And yet somehow, in a speech delivered two weeks later, President Bush portrayed Abu Zubaydah as "one of the top operatives plotting and planning death and destruction on the United States." And over the months to come, under White House and Justice Department direction, the CIA would make him its first test subject for harsh interrogation techniques.

Which brings us back to the unbalanced Abu Zubaydah. "I said he was important," Bush reportedly told Tenet at one of their daily meetings. "You're not going to let me lose face on this, are you?" "No sir, Mr. President," Tenet replied. Bush "was fixated on how to get Zubaydah to tell us the truth," Suskind writes, and he asked one briefer, "Do some of these harsh methods really work?" Interrogators did their best to find out, Suskind reports. They strapped Abu Zubaydah to a water-board, which reproduces the agony of drowning. They threatened him with certain death. They withheld medication. They bombarded him with deafening noise and harsh lights, depriving him of sleep. Under that duress, he began to speak of plots of every variety — against shopping malls, banks, supermarkets, water systems, nuclear plants, apartment buildings, the Brooklyn Bridge, the Statue of Liberty. With each new tale, "thousands of uniformed men and women raced in a panic to each . . . target."

A quote from Suskind summarizes things nicely:

the United States would torture a mentally disturbed man and then leap, screaming, at every word he uttered.

Gotta get this book and read it.

“Fatal Inaction”

The sheer incompetence and gall of our current administration is highlighted in this amazing article from the Washington Post (I think it’s from the Sunday Magazine; h/t Christy Hardin Smith at firedoglake). The article details the inability of our government to provide even the most basic equipment for the men and women of our Armed Forces. And it’s not just the inability to provide these basics from the start; it’s the inability to adequately provide these basics even months and years after the shortfalls are known. Further, it’s really makes clear the gall and callousness of the administration in the planning of this illegal war: any viewpoints or intelligence which indicated anything that the administration didn’t want to hear (such as how there were no WMD, or how we might not be greeted as liberators, etc.) was summarily rejected and ignored. All of us are paying the price for those decisions now.

The article is an incredible one, and is a must read for everyone.

What Bush KNEW BEFORE Katrina struck

The AP has obtained a video which shows our fearful leader being briefed on how bad the impact of Katrina would be *BEFORE* Katrina struck landfall. The video belies much of what was said by the president in the wake of Katrina, i.e. the "I don't think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees", etc.

Some more catching up…

Another hodge-podge post…

Links Galore (or, catching up on the news from the past week)

Posts Galore today… missed a chance to post some stuff I thought was pretty important… gonna post it all now.

  • Ahh, those republicans… When one of your own is under indictment for money laundering and has been admonished for using the department of Homeland Security to track political enemies, why not put him on the House Appropriations committee? I mean, I'm sure he's learned his lesson, right?
  • Now that Samuel Alito will be our next Supreme Court Justice, South Dakota moves to ban ALL abortions. I'm sure they don't know anything that Arlen Specter, Lincoln Chafee, or any of the other Republicans who vowed to reject anyone who wouldn't uphold Roe v. Wade doesn't know. In fact, I'm sure they don't know anything more than anyone who voted against Cloture on Alito knows, do they?
  • We also now know that Scooter Libby is saying that his superiors (remember, he worked for Dick Cheney; who might his superiors be?) "authorized" him to reveal classified information in order to discredit political opponents and prop up the case for invading Iraq.
  • More nonsense from the preznit on the so-called "War on Terror". A key quote from the article (by Larry Johnson), something you'll never hear from dubya:

    The facts are indisputable. Since the U.S. invaded Iraq in March of 2003, international terrorist attacks in which people have been killed and injured have almost quadrupled. The number of countries hit by lethal attacks has also increased to unprecedented levels.

Hmm… he *REALLY* didn’t mean what he said…

Not only is the administration saying that the president really didn't mean what he said in the SOTU about reducing middle east oil imports by 75% by 2025 (see post below), but now, he really didn't mean what he said about seriously investigating alternative fuel sources.

Dubya: About what I said last night… I really didn’t mean it.

Just because Dubya says something in the State of the Union, doesn't mean he means it.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.