I sure hope Matt Taibbi is wrong…

Matt Taibbi, who has been one of the best writers out there writing about the crash of our economy and the resulting recession, has a pretty pessimistic post today about the health care reform situation.  And while I hope and pray that he is wrong, I fear that he is right… The monied interests entrenched against any serious reform have basically bought off all of the republicans and enough idiot democrats that I despair for any serious reform.

I wonder when we’ll really figure it out, and see that every other first world country achieves better health results for a fraction of the money we spend, and manage to cover EVERYONE.

What Republicans consider an EMERGENCY

Would it be a debate on the war in Iraq? Maybe a little congressional oversight into our fearful leader’s numerous violations of the law and of the constitution? Or maybe trying to protect the little guy by increasing the minimum wage, or providing health care to all? Of course not… Those aren’t emergencies. The emergency that had the House Republican leadership all a-twitter was…. (drum-roll please) estate-tax reduction. Please read the linked diary… it explains some of the lies that are spouted by those in favor of the estate-tax reduction.

Catching Up…

A few links I thought were worth sharing:

  • Why is it that foreign news outlets do an infinitely better job of reporting on items that are actually newsworthy than US news outlets? Case in point: this article in the Toronto Star which reports on the first “Terrorism Index” put out by the journal Foriegn Policy. Key quotes from the Star article:

    • Some 86 per cent of them said the world has grown more, not less, dangerous, despite President George W. Bush’s claims that the U.S. is winning the war on terror.
      The main reasons for the decline in security, they said, were the war in Iraq, the detention of terror suspects in Guantanamo Bay, U.S. policy towards Iran and U.S. energy policy.
    • “When you strip away the politics, the experts, almost to a person, are very worried about the administration,” says Joe Cirincione, vice-president of the Center for American Progress, the Washington think-tank which co-sponsored the survey.
      “They think none of our front-line institutions is doing a good job and that Iraq has made the terror situation much worse.”

  • So the Republicans want a debate on Iraq (well, not really). But if they do, georgia10 at DailyKos is ready for it.

  • Were voting machines that were decertified by California used in the highly contested CA-50 election to replace jailed Republican Congressman Duke Cunningham? It appears so, and the Registrar for San Diego County and the (Republican) Secretary of State don’t seem to care. Did any hanky-panky go on which might have swung a close election in one direction? Wouldn’t anyone who cares about democracy want to know. Apparently not the Registrar of a Republican County and the Republican Secretary of State.

  • Republican Senators prevent an up-or-down vote on an increase to the minimum wage, which

    • has been $5.15 an hour for almost 10 years, and is worth less now that at almost anytime in the last 50 years. Adjusted for inflation, the minimum wage in 1968 would be worth $9.09 today, 75% more than the current wage.

  • At the same time, Republican House of Representative members remove a Democratic amendment increasing the minimum wage from the Labor-HHS bill, while reviving the effort to repeal the estate tax. Classic Republican focus: ignore those who are slaving to make ends meet at minimum-wage jobs while protecting that tiny fraction of the population (0.3%) lucky enough to inherit more wealth than they know what to do with. Quite a set of values, huh?

  • For those out there who fail to see the real world impact of Republican pro-business and anti-consumer policies, you may want to watch the latest edition of HBO’s Real Sports (the basic gist is diaried here in this diary at DailyKos). It is somewhat sad, though, that it takes a program on sports to really convey news.

  • Finally, The University of California gave men’s basketball coach Ben Braun a two-year extension. I certainly don’t agree with the extension, but if it was given primarily to ensure that recruiting wasn’t affected, it might be ok. The key thing to know about the extension is if/how much the university is on the hook for if they decide to let Braun go (say, after next season if the Bears don’t make the tournament).

“The One Percent Doctrine”…

is the name of a new book by Ron Suskind (amazon.com link here), which details the administrations actions and policies in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of 9/11. A good insight into the book is given in a review by the Washington Post, which explains in detail what Suskind learned about the man George W. Bush called "one of the top operatives plotting and planning death and destruction on the United States," Abu Zubaydah. However, according to the review,

Abu Zubaydah, his captors discovered, turned out to be mentally ill and nothing like the pivotal figure they supposed him to be. CIA and FBI analysts, poring over a diary he kept for more than a decade, found entries "in the voice of three people: Hani 1, Hani 2, and Hani 3" — a boy, a young man and a middle-aged alter ego. All three recorded in numbing detail "what people ate, or wore, or trifling things they said." Dan Coleman, then the FBI's top al-Qaeda analyst, told a senior bureau official, "This guy is insane, certifiable, split personality."

Hmm… so a man thought to be a major adversary in the War on Terror turns out to be mentally disturbed. Could it get worse? Only if one was to then torture this man and then use information obtained in the torture of an insane man in the run-up to war:

Abu Zubaydah also appeared to know nothing about terrorist operations; rather, he was al-Qaeda's go-to guy for minor logistics — travel for wives and children and the like. That judgment was "echoed at the top of CIA and was, of course, briefed to the President and Vice President," Suskind writes. And yet somehow, in a speech delivered two weeks later, President Bush portrayed Abu Zubaydah as "one of the top operatives plotting and planning death and destruction on the United States." And over the months to come, under White House and Justice Department direction, the CIA would make him its first test subject for harsh interrogation techniques.

Which brings us back to the unbalanced Abu Zubaydah. "I said he was important," Bush reportedly told Tenet at one of their daily meetings. "You're not going to let me lose face on this, are you?" "No sir, Mr. President," Tenet replied. Bush "was fixated on how to get Zubaydah to tell us the truth," Suskind writes, and he asked one briefer, "Do some of these harsh methods really work?" Interrogators did their best to find out, Suskind reports. They strapped Abu Zubaydah to a water-board, which reproduces the agony of drowning. They threatened him with certain death. They withheld medication. They bombarded him with deafening noise and harsh lights, depriving him of sleep. Under that duress, he began to speak of plots of every variety — against shopping malls, banks, supermarkets, water systems, nuclear plants, apartment buildings, the Brooklyn Bridge, the Statue of Liberty. With each new tale, "thousands of uniformed men and women raced in a panic to each . . . target."

A quote from Suskind summarizes things nicely:

the United States would torture a mentally disturbed man and then leap, screaming, at every word he uttered.

Gotta get this book and read it.

The Republican war on science

There’s a fantastic entry over at DailyKos today that talks about the current administration’s political interference in science. Rep. Brad Miller (D-North Carolina) recently tried to introduce an amendment to curb the tide of the Republican war on science by codifying the existence of the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which was rejected last week. As the author of the post says:

…blind pursuit of an ideological agenda at the expense of reality leads, sooner or later, to catastrophe: The science and technical information produced by these tax supported agencies includes research and data that bears a direct relation on public health and safety. The potential end result of repressing or censoring objective analysis aiding in any policy decision where facts count can be profoundly tragic.

Well worth the read.

Torture is unamerican

Despite what our current administration wants you to believe, the torture of prisoners is decidedly un-american, going back to the revolutionary war, as this op-ed points out.

Orwellian Naming

There's a great post over at TPMCafe asking the question of why Republicans feel they have to name the laws they pass and initiatives they pursue in such false and obfuscating ways. It's as if they are afraid to tell the public what the laws and initiatives really are (giveaways to big business and Corporate America), because they know they would have no support for those initiatives. I'd also encourage you to read the second comment (the one by NickDoe); it really expands on the point the original author makes.

UPDATE: As another example, a sitting bankruptcy judge blasts Congress for the grossly mis-named "Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act" passed last year.